Recovery of Noble Royalties Investment Losses
Thursday, June 13th, 2013Have you suffered substantial losses in your investment with Noble Royalties? If so, the securities fraud attorneys at The White Law Group may be able to help you recover your losses.
According to Noble Royalties website, the company specializes in the acquisition, funding and management of coal, oil and natural gas royalties. Noble was founded in 1997 and has become one of the largest independent buyers of oil and gas royalties in the U.S.
Noble offers multiple investment products to accredited investors through various broker-dealers. The White Law Group is investigating the liability some broker-dealers may have for selling Noble investment products, particularly Noble Royalty Access Fund III, IV and V, tounsuitable investors.
Oil and gas private placements, like many of the Noble investment products, are often speculative ventures. Private placements are light in regulatory oversight and as such intended for accredited investors.
Broker-dealers are required by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) to sell private placements only to accredited investors that meet suitability standards. The investors’ age, risk tolerance, net worth, and investment experience should be taken in to account inorder to determine whether a particular investment recommendation is suitable. Broker-dealers that overlook FINRA suitability requirements can be liable for investment losses through FINRA arbitration.
The White Law Group, LLC is a national securities fraud, securities arbitration, and investor protection law firm with offices in Chicago, Illinois and Boca Raton, Florida
For more information on The White Law Group, visit http://www.whitesecuritieslaw.
Tags: investment lawyer, Noble Royalties class action, Noble Royalties lawsuit, Noble Royalty Access Fund 12, Noble Royalty Access Fund 13, Noble Royalty Access Fund current value, Noble Royalty Access Fund fraud, Noble Royalty Access Fund III, Noble Royalty Access Fund investigation, Noble Royalty Access Fund IV, Noble Royalty Access Fund IX, Noble Royalty Access Fund losses, Noble Royalty Access Fund recovery, Noble Royalty Access Fund V, Noble Royalty Access Fund VI, Noble Royalty Access Fund VII, Noble Royalty Access Fund VIII, Noble Royalty Access Fund X, Noble Royalty Access Fund XI, oil and gas attorney, securities fraud attorney
Will the bond bubble burst?
Thursday, June 13th, 2013When disclosing the risk of a particular bond offering, a financial advisor must make the investor fully aware of the following risks associated with all bonds: (1) Inflationary risk – i.e., the risk that fixed-income investments historically underperform other investments during times of inflation; (2) Credit risk – i.e., the risk that the company offering the bond could be downgraded by reporting agencies (such as Moody’s) affecting the value of the bond, and (3) Interest rate risk – i.e., the risk that the value of the bond could decrease if interest rates increase (this is precisely the risk that is currently present in the bond market and which must be disclosed by a broker before recommending a bond to any client).
In today’s investment climate, the big disclosure that a broker must make has to do with interest rate risk. With interest rates at all time lows, history tells us that the risk that current long term bonds will reduce in value when/if rates increase is quite high. If a financial advisor failed to disclose this potential risk of investing in bonds, and instead represented that investing in bonds is “safe,” then the investor may have a claim for failure to adequately disclose the true risks of investing in bonds at historically low yields. This risk is magnified if the maturity of the bond is longer. The longer the maturity of a particular bond or group of bonds, the greater impact changing interest rates will have. So, if a financial advisor recommends to a client in a historically low yield environment (like the one we are currently in) to over-concentrate their portfolio in long term bonds, the risk of loss is substantially greater than if the broker recommended short term bonds.
With various experts predicting that an increase in interest rates could result in dramatic losses in long term bonds, the question becomes which funds are potentially at risk. The following are all bond funds with long “effective maturities”:
| BlackRock High Yield Municipal Instl |
| BlackRock High Yield Municipal Inv A |
| BlackRock High Yield Municipal Inv C |
| Federated US Government Bond Svc |
| Franklin AL Tax-Free Income A |
| Franklin AL Tax-Free Income C |
| Franklin CA Insured Tax-Free Inc A |
| Franklin CA Insured Tax-Free Inc Adv |
| Franklin CA Insured Tax-Free Inc C |
| Franklin CA Tax-Free Inc Adv |
| Franklin CA Tax-Free Income A |
| Franklin CA Tax-Free Income B |
| Franklin CA Tax-Free Income C |
| Franklin CO Tax-Free Income A |
| Franklin CO Tax-Free Income Adv |
| Franklin CO Tax-Free Income C |
| Franklin CT Tax-Free Income A |
| Franklin CT Tax-Free Income Adv |
| Franklin CT Tax-Free Income C |
| Franklin Double Tax-Free Income A |
| Franklin Double Tax-Free Income Adv |
| Franklin Double Tax-Free Income C |
| Franklin Federal Tax-Free Income A |
| Franklin Federal Tax-Free Income Adv |
| Franklin Federal Tax-Free Income B |
| Franklin Federal Tax-Free Income C |
| Franklin FL Tax-Free Income A |
| Franklin FL Tax-Free Income C |
| Franklin High Yield Tax-Free Inc A |
| Franklin High Yield Tax-Free Inc Adv |
| Franklin High Yield Tax-Free Inc B |
| Franklin High Yield Tax-Free Inc C |
| Franklin Insured Tax-Free Income A |
| Franklin Insured Tax-Free Income Adv |
| Franklin Insured Tax-Free Income B |
| Franklin Insured Tax-Free Income C |
| Franklin MA Tax-Free Income A |
| Franklin MA Tax-Free Income C |
| Franklin MD Tax-Free Income A |
| Franklin MD Tax-Free Income Adv |
| Franklin MD Tax-Free Income C |
| Franklin NC Tax-Free Income A |
| Franklin NC Tax-Free Income Adv |
| Franklin NC Tax-Free Income C |
| Franklin NY Tax-Free Income A |
| Franklin NY Tax-Free Income Adv |
| Franklin NY Tax-Free Income B |
| Franklin NY Tax-Free Income C |
| Franklin PA Tax-Free Income A |
| Franklin PA Tax-Free Income Adv |
| Franklin PA Tax-Free Income B |
| Franklin PA Tax-Free Income C |
| Franklin VA Tax-Free Income A |
| Franklin VA Tax-Free Income Adv |
| Franklin VA Tax-Free Income C |
| Guggenheim Municipal Income A |
| Guggenheim Municipal Income C |
| Guggenheim Municipal Income Instl |
| Ivy Municipal High Income A |
| Ivy Municipal High Income B |
| Ivy Municipal High Income C |
| Ivy Municipal High Income I |
| Ivy Municipal High Income Y |
| Pioneer High Income Municipal A |
| Pioneer High Income Municipal C |
| Pioneer High Income Municipal Y |
| RS High Income Municipal Bond A |
| RS High Income Municipal Bond C |
| RS High Income Municipal Bond Y |
| T. Rowe Price Tax-Free High Yield |
| T. Rowe Price Tax-Free High Yield Adv |
| T. Rowe Price US Treasury Long-Term |
| Vanguard Extended Dur Treas Idx I |
| Vanguard Long-Term Bond Idx InstlPls |
| Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index I |
| Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Inv |
| Vanguard Long-Term Corp Bond Idx I |
| Vanguard Long-Term Corp Bond Idx Signal |
| Vanguard Long-Term Govt Bd Idx Signal |
| Vanguard Long-Term Govt Bond Idx I |
| Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Admiral |
| Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Inv |
| Waddell & Reed Muni Hi-Inc A |
| Waddell & Reed Muni Hi-Inc B |
| Waddell & Reed Muni Hi-Inc C |
Due to their long maturities, these bond funds appear most exposed to the risk of increased interest rates.
If you suffered losses investing in long-duration bond funds and would like to discuss your litigation options, please call the securities attorneys of The White Law Group at 312/238-9650 for a free consultation.
The White Law Group is a national securities fraud, securities arbitration, and investor protection law firm with offices in Chicago, Illinois and Boca Raton, Florida.
For more information on The White Law Group, visit http://www.whitesecuritieslaw.com.
Tags: bond fraud attorney, bond fraud lawyer, bond fund bubble, bond interest rate risk, bond losses attorney, bond losses lawyer
More Bad News for Thompson National Properties
Thursday, June 13th, 2013According to reports, a former chief financial officer of Thompson National Properties was recently suspended for five months from the securities industry for failing to conduct adequate and independent due diligence into an array of Thompson’s real estate deals.
According to a FINRA Order, FINRA recently suspended Wendy J. Worcester, who was also co-chief compliance officer of the broker-dealer controlled by Mr. Thompson, TNP Securities LLC, from working with a Finra broker-dealer and fined her $15,000.
The Order alleges that Ms. Worcester “failed to conduct adequate and independent” due diligence regarding three separate private-placement offerings sponsored by Thompson National Properties LLC. FINRA further alleged, according to the reports, that she “thus compromised the independence” of the broker-dealer, TNP Securities.
The Order further states that in 2009 Thompson National Properties was allegedly hurting for cash, posting losses that year of almost $25.8 million, and that this resulted in negative net equity of $13.6 million for the firm, which was in the middle of launching its REIT, the TNP Strategic Retail Trust Inc. FINRA further alleges that two of the Thompson private placements, both note programs, paid old investors with new investor money or money from elsewhere in the operation.
The Order specifically states that “[d]uring 2009 and 2010, the [TNP 12% Notes Program LLC and TNP Participating Notes Program LLC] were unable to pay certain investor distributions from operating cash flow,” and that, instead, they “relied on new investor proceeds or transfers of cash from [Thompson National Properties] or its affiliates in order to make distributions to investors.”
Upon information and belief, both these note programs are now in default.
According to the Finra order, Ms. Worcester consented to it without admitting or denying its allegations. Finra is also apparently conducting an investigation into Mr. Thompson and TNP Securities for failing to hand over a log of more than 300,000 e-mails to the firm’s attorney. Earlier this year, the REIT suspended the payment of dividends to investors.
The White Law Group has been monitoring this situation for some time. Based on what is now known about the Thompson National Properties offerings – TNP Strategic Retail Trust, TNP 12% Notes Program, and TNP Participating Notes Program – it appears that the brokerage firms that sold these investments may be liable for any losses due to their failure to perform adequate due diligence on these offerings.
Brokerage firms have a fiduciary duty to their clients to perform adequate due diligence on any offering before offering it for sale to their clients. For more information on The White Law Group’s investigation into potential FINRA arbitration claims involving these products, visit http://www.whitesecuritieslaw.com/2013/03/20/tnp-strategic-retail-trust-cuts-dividend/ or http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/1047207-d-daxton-white/1662781-information-for-tnp-strategic-retail-trust-and-thompson-national-properties-investors
For a free consultation with a securities attorney regarding your TNP litigation options, please call The White Law Group’s Chicago office at 312/238-9650.
For more information on The White Law Group, visit http://www.whitesecuritieslaw.com.
Tags: Thompson National Properties FINRA investigation, Thompson National Properties lawsuit, Thompson National Properties losses, TNP 12% Notes Program class action, TNP 12% Notes Program default, TNP 12% Notes Program investigation, TNP 12% Notes Program lawsuit, TNP 12% Notes Program losses, TNP Strategic Retail Trust class action, TNP Strategic Retail Trust current value, TNP Strategic Retail Trust investigation, TNP Strategic Retail Trust lawsuit, TNP Strategic Retail Trust losses, TNP Strategic Retail Trust news, Wendy J. Worcester FINRA fine, Wendy J. Worcester FINRA suspension
Securities Fraud Investigation into Greg Campbell
Monday, June 10th, 2013On June 7, 2013, Greg J. Campbell of Clayton, Missouri pled guilty to misappropriating over $2 million in funds from customers accounts while working at Merrill Lynch and LPL.
According to reports, while working at Merril Lynch, Campbell established Loan Management Accounts (LMAs) for his clients, often without their consent, which he used to divert over $1.4 million into his own personal accounts. Campbell allegedly used the money to pay his mortgage and finance luxury cars.
In addition, while working as a senior wealth manager for Four Seasons Wealth Management, a company that offered financial advisory services to clients through LPL Financial, Campbell diverted funds approximately $360,000 from his clients’ IRA accounts. Many of Campbell’s victims were purportedly elderly and close family relatives.
Brokerage firms have a supervisory responsibility to monitor the activity and conduct of their brokers. When a FINRA registered broker, such as Campbell, misappropriates and diverts client’s funds for personal use, the brokerage firm may be liable for negligent supervision and responsible for losses in a FINRA dispute resolution claim.
According to Campbell’s BrokerCheck Report (CRD), he worked as a registered FINRA broker with A. G. Edwards & Sons from 01/2004-06/2006, Merrill Lynch from 06/2006-10/2011, and LPL Financial from 11/2011-11/2012.
If you invested with Greg J. Campbell and would like to speak to a securities attorney about your potential to recover losses through FINRA arbitration, please call the securities attorneys of The White Law Group at 312-238-9650 for a free consultation.
The White Law Group, LLC is a national securities fraud, securities arbitration, investor protection, and securities regulation/compliance law firm with offices in Chicago, Illinois and Boca Raton, Florida.
For more information on The White Law Group, visit http://www.whitesecuritieslaw.
Tags: Four Seasons Wealth Management, Greg Campbell Four Seasons, Greg Campbell fraud charges, Greg Campbell fraud investigation, Greg Campbell investment losses, Greg Campbell lawsuit, Greg Campbell LPL, Greg Campbell Merrill lynch, Greg Campbell misappropriation, Greg Campbell sentencing, Greg Campbell theft, Missouri securities attorney, Missouri securities fraud lawyer
Investigation into Promissory Notes in Detroit Cemeteries
Monday, June 10th, 2013According to reports the managing partner of Detroit Memorial Partners (“DMP”), Mark Morrow, is accused of issuing approximately $19 million in fraudulent promissory notes and $4.5 million in equity interests.
The allegations brought forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) accuse DMP and Morrow of making material misrepresentations and omissions to investors. DMP and Morrow allegedly told investors that they owned various cemetery properties in Michigan and that the notes would be secured by theses properties. However, according to the SEC, DMP apparently did not own any cemetery properties and the notes were never registered with
the SEC.
In addition, investors were allegedly told that proceeds from the notes would be used to acquire and manage the properties, when in fact the proceeds were purportedly used to fund Morrow’s personal equity interest in DMP and pay the interest owed to other DMP note holders. Morrow allegedly told investors that DMP was debt free despite the substantial obligations to
note holders.
According to the SEC, approximately 190 investors throughout the US purchased the notes. The notes were sold by Summit Capital, the advisory firm of Morrow’s long-time associate Angelo Alleca, who is currently under investigation by the SEC for operating a Ponzi scheme.
According to his FINRA BrokerCheck Report (CRD), Morrow has worked with Summit Capital Investment Group since 04/1998 and Summit Capital Trading since 04/1997. Marrow is also a licensed broker and has worked with the following registered FINRA firms: Olde Discount Corporation 01/1988-02/1996, Westport Resources Investment Services from 05/1996-08/1996, Online Trading Inc from 04/1997-08/1997, and Landmark Investment Group form 12/1998-10/2012.
When a FINRA registered broker, like Morrow, conducts business outside of the brokerage firm his activity can be considered “selling away.” If a registered broker “sells away,” the brokerage firm may liable for negligent supervision of their employee and can potentially be held responsible for investment losses through a FINRA dispute resolution claim. As such, to the extent that Morrow solicited investments in promissory notes while registered with a FINRA affiliated firm, the firm may have liability for failing to properly supervise Morrow.
If you invested in Detroit Memorial Partners through Mark Morrow or Angelo Alleca and would like to speak to a securities attorney about your litigation options, please call the securities attorneys of The White Law Group at 312-238-9650 for a free consultation.
The White Law Group, LLC is a national securities fraud, securities arbitration, investor protection, and securities regulation/compliance law firm with offices in Chicago, Illinois and Boca Raton, Florida.
For more information on The White Law Group, please visit our website at
http://whitesecuritieslaw.com.
Tags: Detroit cemetery scam, Detroit Memorial Partners, fraudulent cemetery notes