December 3, 2020 Comments (5) Blog, Securities Fraud

Financial Advisor Promissory Note Attorneys – FINRA Lawyers

Financial Advisor Promissory Notes, Featured by Top Securities Fraud Attorneys, The White Law Group

Securities Attorneys for Promissory Note Arbitration Cases

A Promissory Note (often called an up-front forgivable loan) is commonly used as a recruiting tool by many of the major brokerage firms in the securities industry, including Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Wells Fargo Securities, Ameriprise, and UBS Financial Services. Essentially, brokerage firms use the up-front forgivable loans to recruit financial advisors from other firms to bring their clients (or “book of business”) to the new firm.

Typically these loans are then forgiven by the hiring firm on a monthly or annual basis and if the financial advisor remains with the new firm through the duration of the forgiveness period of the loan, the broker does not have to repay the loan. If, however, the financial advisor resigns from the brokerage firm, or is terminated, before the loan is forgiven, the broker is contractually obligated to repay the outstanding amounts owed on the loan and the brokerage firm will often move to collect the outstanding amount still owed on the loan.

Often, the brokerage firm does this by sending a “demand letter” requesting that the financial advisor repay the money owed on the promissory notes. If this demand letter is sent by an outside collection agency, including an outside law firm, the demand letter is required to be in compliance with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. As such, the demand letter should include (1) the outstanding balance on the promissory notes (the amount owed, including interest), (2) the demand letter should provide the debtor with thirty days to dispute the debt, and (3) the demand letter should provide validity of the debt (usually by attaching a copy of the promissory note).

What happens when the broker and firm can’t reach an agreement?

If the broker fails to respond to the demand letter or if the financial advisor and brokerage firm are unable to reach a mutually satisfactory settlement agreement, the brokerage firm will often then elect to sue the broker for failure to repay the promissory note(s). If the brokerage firm does sue the former financial advisor, such a suit will likely be filed with The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ( FINRA). This is because brokers typically agree to arbitrate any dispute between themselves and their employers through FINRA arbitration at the onset of their employment agreements.

A similar arbitration clause is also usually included in the promissory notes. Moreover, the financial advisor’s U-4 sets forth that a financial advisor (or associated person in the industry) agrees to FINRA’s jurisdiction for disputes.

Once the brokerage firm’s claim against the former broker is filed, pursuant to FINRA Rule 13303, the financial advisor has 45 days to file an Answer.

The common defenses/counterclaims asserted by financial advisors in defending against claims brought by brokerage firms to collect on these promissory notes are:

Misrepresentation/fraudulent inducement (related to promises regarding the terms of employment)


Wrongful termination/constructive discharge 

Unjust enrichment (related to clients the financial advisor may have left behind), 

Breach of contract

Another equity argument that is often asserted is that the forgiveness of the notes should be pro rated although the notes are often forgiven on an annual basis, the broker can still argue that equity should provide that the forgiveness date should be the date that the broker left the firm and not the date of the last annual forgiveness.

Once the defenses or counterclaims are filed, the parties then proceed to the discovery process and set the matter for hearing. The case is then decided by either an industry or public panel depending on the counterclaims raised.

If the brokerage firm takes their claim all the way to hearing and gets an award against the financial advisor, the financial advisor is required by FINRA Rules to pay the award. Specifically, Rule 9554(a) provides that an associated person’s failure to comply with a settlement agreement or award related to an arbitration or mediation within 21 days of notice by FINRA will result in a suspension of the associated person from the industry.

As such, if a financial advisor gets an arbitration award against him/her related to his/her obligations on their promissory notes, and fails to pay that award, the broker may be suspended from the industry. 

There are a few ways to avoid being suspending without paying the award (including agreeing with the brokerage firm to settle the award with payments over time, declaring bankruptcy, or demonstrating to FINRA a legitimate inability to pay the award) but generally speaking a financial advisor is obligated to pay the award if the brokerage firm prevails.

Significant Provisions of a Financial Advisor Promissory Note

Before entering into any up-front forgivable loan agreement with a brokerage firm, there are a few significant provisions in virtually every Promissory Note of which financial advisors should be aware.

(1) A Promissory Note will almost always include a provision setting forth the financial advisors employment as an “at-will” employee. A typical example of such a provision is as follows:

“This Agreement is not a contract of employment for any period of time. The Borrower’s employment with the Lender is on an “at-will” basis which means that the employment relationship can be terminated at any time for any reason or no reason by either party. Nothing herein shall be construed as a contract of employment for a definite term.”

The reasons this provision is included are obvious. While most employees are at-will employees, brokerage firms still want this arrangement to be spelled out so that the employee can not later argue that the brokerage firm made promises of employment for a specified period of time. Although there is case law that claims FINRA arbitration agreement changes a broker’s at-will relationship with a brokerage firm to “something else,” requiring justification for a discharge (see, e.g. Paine Webber v. Agron, 49 F. 3d. 347, 352 (8th Cir. 1994)), “at-will” provisions are generally enforced.

(2) Promissory Notes also almost always provide for the broker being obligated to reimburse the brokerage firm for any costs of collection in the event of default (including attorney’s fees and costs). Although many states require that an attorney fees provision be reciprocal (meaning that the broker would be entitled to his/her attorneys’ fees if he/she disputes the debt and ultimately prevails), the provision in the promissory notes will not be drafted that way, and a broker should be aware that they may be on the hook for the brokerage firm’s attorneys fees if they fail to repay their prior employer.

(3) Similarly, the Notes also generally provide for interest to accrue both while the broker remains with the brokerage firm and after default. As such, if the broker is in default and is considering settling, it is better to do so sooner rather than later.

(4) Another provision that is significant is that the Notes usually provide for the brokerage’s firm authority to restrict the broker’s brokerage account if any amounts owed on the loans become outstanding. A typical example of such a provision is as follows:

“The Lender shall have the right, upon default, without notice, to withhold any monies payable by it to the Borrower, as commissions or otherwise or from any amounts payable under any non-qualified deferred compensation or similar arrangement sponsored by the Lender, and to withhold other monies, securities, commodities or other properties of the Borrower which may at any time be in the possession of the Lender for any purpose; and to apply such monies, etc., to satisfy the indebtedness due under this Note. The Borrower hereby authorizes and consents to the aforementioned deductions.”

Depending on the broker’s separate customer agreements, these restrictions may apply to joint accounts in addition to individual accounts, and if the financial advisor leaves his/her employer owing money on a promissory note and with money in a brokerage account held by their employer, the brokerage firm is likely to restrict that account.

Free Consultation with a FINRA Attorney

If you have questions about a financial advisor promissory note, The White Law Group may be able to help you. To speak to a securities attorney, please call our Chicago office at 888-637-5510.

The White Law Group, LLC is a national securities fraud, securities arbitration, investor protection, and securities regulation/compliance law firm with offices in Chicago, Illinois.

To learn more about The White Law Group, visit


5 Responses to Financial Advisor Promissory Note Attorneys – FINRA Lawyers

  1. Richard Jenness says:

    I find this very useful. I am in a situation where after having left my previous brokerage firm they issued a letter to my clients recommending a new broker. The letter oddly enough had my name in the signature portion and referred to me in the body of the letter as the branch manager which I was not.

    Would this be a violation of NASD regulations? They did the same thing to my branch manager when he left 4 month prior to my departure and were made well aware of the situation at that time. They were obviously negligent in their regulation of outgoing mail.
    Any Ideas?

  2. Adriana Wicher says:

    Great post I am definitly bookmarking this. Thanks for the resource.

  3. Bradley G. Barnett says:

    Does becoming SS disabled during or after employment with a brokerage firm void the loan? In most forgivable loans this is a provision.

  4. D. Daxton White says:

    It would depend on the language of the Note. If you would like us to review a promissory note and give you an opinion, please contact us at 312/238-9650.

  5. Zanne Lyon says:

    Good article – wonder about the tax liability of the balance of forgivable loans when a broker dies part-way into the timeframe? I.E., a wirehouse “lends” $1,000,000 to a recruit; he receives it up front, has paid taxes on it two of the eight years, then dies unexpectedly. His heirs receive the forgiven balance (about $800,000), nothing is said about tax issue until a 1099 is issued by the wirehouse to the deceased broker (two years later). Although the heirs not taxable (under the limit), is the broker’s estate?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.